Meteor vs LiquidBounce — Minecraft Client Comparison
Meteor and LiquidBounce are both modern Fabric clients with mixin-based architectures and active development. They differ in ecosystem focus: Meteor provides a public addon API and a modern modular HUD, while LiquidBounce prioritizes an extensive built-in module list and legacy 1.8 support.
Quick answer
Choose Meteor if you want a modern GUI, a strong addon ecosystem, and fast version updates on current Minecraft releases. Choose LiquidBounce if you want a larger built-in module set, script module support, or legacy 1.8 compatibility. Both are free, open source, and Fabric-based.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Meteor | LiquidBounce |
|---|---|---|
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Loader | Fabric | Fabric (modern) / Forge (legacy 1.8) |
| Addon API | Public — documented third-party addon support | Script module system |
| Latest MC versions | 1.21.1, 1.21.5, 1.21.8, 1.21.11 | 1.21.1, 1.21.5 |
| HUD | Modular HUD editor with draggable elements | Configurable HUD |
| Module count | Moderate built-in set plus addons | Large built-in set |
| Status | Active | Active |
Addons vs built-in modules
Meteor ships a smaller built-in module set and relies on community addons to extend coverage. This keeps the core client lean but means you may need to install addons for specific features. LiquidBounce ships a much larger built-in set, so most features are available out of the box without installing additional packages. The trade-off is size and update surface: more modules means more code that can break on Minecraft updates.
GUI and HUD
Meteor's HUD editor is modular — every element is draggable, resizable, and can be toggled independently. LiquidBounce's HUD is also configurable but uses a different layout model. Neither is objectively better; the choice is a matter of preference and how much time you want to spend arranging the interface.
Version support
Meteor currently covers a wider range of recent Minecraft releases including 1.21.11. LiquidBounce's modern branch focuses on 1.21.1 and 1.21.5. If you need the newest Minecraft versions, Meteor is more likely to have a build available. For 1.8 legacy servers, LiquidBounce's dedicated legacy branch is the relevant option.
Which one should you choose?
Choose Meteor for a modern HUD, addon extensibility, and fast version updates. Choose LiquidBounce for a large built-in module set, script support, and legacy 1.8 access. Both are actively maintained. Running both on separate Minecraft profiles is possible and common — each client stores its configuration in its own directory.